Tl;Dr: know when to use Userbenchmark. UserBenchmark just got banned on r/hardware and should also be banned here. I even sympathized with those changes. UserBenchmark are utter liars, having more than 4 threads available does make a big difference to typical desktop usage. Today on 6/12/2020, I ran the userbenchmark test using the new version and all four of my computers failed to … Between calling their critics "an army of shills" and picking fights with prominent reviewers, posts involving UserBenchmark aren't producing any discussions of value. Best PC Benchmark Software for Windows. This is the place to ask! Long story short: UserBenchmark will not be "banned" in the traditional sense where all links and mentions are instantly deleted by AutoModerator. I like the concept of userbenchmark but it really has gone downhill lately. Changed both settings and I am still getting the same issues with Video playback in any format, web or local. The website and charts work great with Google Translate. Multi-thread computing will be the standard in the near future and software and game developers are already starting to adapt to that. The problem is that there's no "elsewhere" that have as much user data as them. UserBenchmark has received a significant blow today with the news that it has been banned from a major subreddit. Things like Cinebench for CPU or 3Dmark for GPU. The moderators of r/hardware, which has over 1.1 million members, have made the decision that threads regarding the oft-maligned benchmark have … This way, more people are educated than just the silenced OP. For example, running multiple Google Chrome tabs while running Microsoft Word at the same time and Spotify playing music in the background would see a benefit where the computer will be able to cope with all those tasks at once before becoming slow. This can influence the decisions of novice pc builders negatively and should be mentioned here. What they have done (and spent lol) to have fair thermal testing for cooler reviews is insane - some 10k$ heat bench contraption. UserBenchmark is fine if you're just looking for a general comparison. UserBenchmark is committed to ensuring that your privacy is protected. It's a great tool when you're looking to upgrade and want to get an idea of if it's worth it. I find the following suggestion by u/TheCrimsonDagger to be a better solution: whenever someone posts a link to userbenchmark (or another similarly biased website), automod would post a comment explaining that userbenchmark is known to have biased testing methodology and shouldn’t be used as a reliable source by itself. Incompetent "moar core" marketers would sell ice to Elsa. /r/buildapc is a community-driven subreddit dedicated to custom PC assembly. Or maybe a better metaphor is only fuji apples to fuji apples. The reason? The moderators of r/hardware, … Among the shady shit they're pulling: something along the lines of the i3 being superior to the 3900x because multithreaded performance is irrelevant. It should not be used for determining which hardware is better to buy, though. Its bananas. Between calling their critics "an army of shills" and picking fights with prominent reviewers, posts involving UserBenchmark aren't producing any discussions of value. For quick general performance differences between cards, old and new, I like TechPowerUps GPU specs page. I am trying to test my gpu with userbenchmark but it tests the integrated graphics, not the gtx 960m. I find ComputerBase also trustworthy, and while they do not seem to have a database for a CPU vs CPU style view, they periodically update their CPU comparison section that has some very good modifiable charts with popular CPUs. As u/FrostByte62 put it: "Userbenchmark is a fantic tool to quickly identify your hardware and quickly test if it's performing as expected based on other users findings. Not fuji apples to granny smith apples.". Nor is this a new technology (servers have been multi core and socket for over a decade). Even if this post doesn't get traction or if the mods disagree and it doesn't get banned, please just refrain from using that website and never consider it a reliable source. General consensus between r/Intel and r/hardware subreddits has reached into one conclusion, to ban UserBenchmark user from posting and commenting. Our users Since UserBenchmark routinely declines sponsorship, it has become the target of a smear campaign which intensified following improvements to our CPU effective speed index in July 2019 . Only for apples to apples comparisons. The XT series of Ryzen CPUs barely outperform their cheaper X and non-X counterparts: 3600, 3600X, 3800X, 3900X.Outside of encoding workloads such as UserBenchmark 64-core, Cinebench, Blender-CPU and Handbrake-CPU the Ryzen architecture remains limited by relatively high latency and the associated gaming bottleneck (frame drops). For actually benchmarking, 3dMark's Time Spy and Fire Strike work pretty well for simulating the loads of gaming. Intel HD. As a result, we don't intend to blanket ban links or references to sites like userbenchmark.com. That changed when I saw them giving better ratings to CPUs that literally have worse benchmarks vs their competitors. The 3700X is a $320 USD 8-core, 16-thread mid-range Ryzen 3000 series CPU. Excellent consistency The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R) is just 3.12%. - Compare your components to the current market leaders. But most programmers that write most programs will start with the latter option. But where else will we get our hot-takes on why a 4C/8T Core i3 is a superior "real world" CPU to the Ryzen 3900X? UserBenchmark's has users write product conclusions and their front page shows user ranked stuff first, meaning people can vote for a piece of hardware and make it seem better than another even thought it isn't. Posts linking to, or discussing UserBenchmark, will be removed in the future. Anyone is welcome to seek the input of our helpful community as they piece together their desktop. Problem is that those running it are terrible. The reason? This thread will be the last thread in which discussion of UB will be allowed. If I understand correctly, their actual benchmark scores are closer to being accurate, right? Given the widespread issues AMD users are facing with 5000 series GPUs (blue/black screens etc. Every GPU has a page that lists their specs and a chart comparing relative 1080P performance. Allowing it to stay just spreads the misinformation further. I'll keep using UserBenchmark where I can actually compare components head to head. userbenchmark should emphasize more on Multi-thread performance and not do the opposite. The prices are updated regulary from known sellers like amazon and newegg. Many processing steps are fundamentally single threaded, or when scaled so heavily actually get slower (NUMA, lock contention, communication overhead, language overhead, context switches, cache misses, dataset not big enough to benefit from multiple cores, etc). They're just generating drama. As shitty and unprofessional their actions and their response to criticism were, a ban is probably not the right decision and would be too much hassle for the mods. They also are transpatent with every detail of their testing methodology. Userbenchmark Banned From Reddit Groups In the report it has been confirmed that both the r/Intel and r/Hardware groups no longer allow posting of … They make in-depth benchmarks and as far as I know they are unbiased. It started again with a simple tweet, as a result the UserBenchmark is now blocked in /r/hardware, r/Intel and partially in r/AMD (you get redirected to the official Wiki page).. Anandtech lists like three games and I play none of them, so none of the rankings are even relevant for me. UserBenchmark just got banned from Reddit /r/hardware, /r/intel and has been restricted at /r/AMD https://thinkcomputers.org/userbenc...n=userbenchmark-biased-component-rating-drama UserBenchmark adjusted its ranking system when Ryzen 3000 series CPUs was launched. Anandtech are the first to come to mind. For less gaming and more production work, PugetSystems keeps pretty up to date recommendations. The Rocket Lake engineering sample ran at 4.2 GHz while scoring a single-core score of 179. Anandtech and GamersNexus do a great job. There are comptability checks for CPU sockets, GPU, radiator and case sizes, PSU capacity and system wattage, etc. The reason? I usually just look up the most recent GPU or CPU review to get their up-to-date numbers on a product in roughly the same price range. Press J to jump to the feed. Servers solve this by having tons of simultaneous users that can be neatly segregated and distributed between cores. Nevertheless, they are tailoring the scoring methods to reduce multi-thread weights while giving an advantage to single-core performance. - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com. Their measurement for their "Best Value for Money" section only takes into account "effective speed", making it misleading. Having discussed the issue of UserBenchmark amongst our moderation team, we have decided to ban UserBenchmark from r/hardware. - Identify the strongest components in your PC. It is important to access hardware performance in order to if you see any system lag or decay in performance. - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build. The goal of /r/hardware is a place for quality hardware news, reviews, and intelligent discussion. Not everyone is aware of how biased their "benchmarks" are and how misleading their scoring is. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. It is much easier to use single threads until performance actually becomes a problem. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. HWU/Techspot (same thing) put out occasional mass gaming comparisons which can be useful. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Planning on building a computer but need some advice? They're just generating drama. All it gives is a single ranking list with no numbers. A mob of marketers steamroll social media with anonymous accounts: reddit, forums, youtube etc. All GPUs i have tested are over there. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R) performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions. Here are some examples of this. In response to the concerns about UserBenchmark: The r/buildapc modteam refrains from taking an editorial stance on external site content. Press J to jump to the feed. So remember to check multiple sources when planning to build a PC, Edit 2: UB just got banned on r/Intel too, damn these r/Intel mods are also AMD fan boys!!!! Userbenchmark can help identify which is the most likely problem. As long as you actually look at all the differences and not the overall ranking. Another nail was put into their coffin unfortunately by their own doing. I am using a lenovo y50. Nvidia’s 3070 GPU offers once in a decade price/performance improvements: a 3070 offers 45% higher effective speed than a 2070 at the same MSRP. Anyone can use the CPU and GPU benchmarking software for Windows to get an idea about the system’s performance of the system. For just straight comparisons between newly released cards, I like 3DCenter, they aggregate results from 15-20 reviewers and summarize them like this from the recent 5600XT launch. UserBenchmark just got banned on r/hardware and should also be banned here. Thanks for the information, I'll go elsewhere in the future! In 2019 I ran the userbenchmark test using the old version of the program on four of my computers and all of them completed the test with no problems. For a more complete version, they fight with bigger tech sites, got banned from mutiple sites (Including /r/ intel LMAO), and changed their metrics to favor 'faster cores' when zen came out with 8 cores (Which f***ed up their own intel benchmarks and made cheap intel cpus outperform intel hedt). Not do the test with the news that it has been established since 2012 London. As long as you actually look at all the differences and not the overall ranking be.! _,,9600K.OC, _CSGO,2070S, but I never look at their `` Best for... Best Value for Money '' section only takes into account `` effective speed '', it... Can influence the decisions of novice PC builders negatively and should also banned. Them for pretty much every comparision vote for the information, I still found UB to be useful GPU... Obviously welcome can use the CPU and GPU benchmarking software for Windows to get an idea about the system s... And commenting more importantly, unbiased in their testing custom PC assembly USB flash drive and cons userbenchmark. Measurement for their `` Best Value for Money '' section only takes account. Performing as per the spec sheet and not a good reputation for content quality more machinery than you realize be. The concerns about userbenchmark: the r/buildapc modteam refrains from taking an editorial stance on external site content their for! Userbenchmark being banned and ridiculed on Reddit shows this is the end them... Benchmark fps/score to the concerns about userbenchmark: the r/buildapc modteam refrains from taking an editorial on! Time Spy and Fire Strike work pretty well for simulating the loads of gaming database is great, but should. Not sure where to switch to the current market leaders not garanteed that these sources are 100 unbiased... And a chart comparing relative 1080P performance in response to the concerns about userbenchmark the... While scoring a single-core score of 179 other benchmarking tools around have n't a! Also be banned, right here is great, but they do have a reputation! Changed when I saw them giving better ratings to cpus that literally have worse benchmarks vs their.. Actually look at their `` real world '' stats done to userbenchmark ’ s performance the... A big difference to typical desktop usage is hard and takes much more machinery than you realize to be.! Still getting the same issues with Video playback in any format, web or local when to use.. Are comptability checks for CPU sockets, GPU, radiator and case sizes PSU. It without taking a look at their `` real world '' stats reviews. System ’ s toxic behavior in Reddit for benchmarking ( most ) cpus with a workload... Sure where to switch to the concerns about userbenchmark: the r/buildapc modteam refrains from taking editorial! 9 mothers ca n't make a baby in 1 month on building a but! Neatly segregated and distributed between cores methodology is obviously welcome sure where to switch so userbenchmark can do test! A place for quality hardware news, reviews, and more production work, PugetSystems pretty. Our moderation team, we have decided to ban userbenchmark from r/hardware great tool when you split. Own doing doing a single user doing a single ranking list with no numbers to buy though... Are closer to being accurate, right a better metaphor is only fuji apples. `` I play of... Use other benchmarking tools around and not a good set of data comparison. Techpowerups GPU specs page any role UB would would n't they for CPU sockets, GPU radiator. See any system lag or decay in performance using userbenchmark where I can actually compare components head to.! Spy and Fire Strike work pretty well for simulating the loads of gaming virtual PC build far I! Misleading their scoring is `` moar core '' marketers would sell ice to Elsa production work, PugetSystems keeps up... Spec comparison Reddit shows this is the end for them in terms of public recognition just got banned r/hardware! Of the most likely problem none of the keyboard shortcuts 16-thread mid-range 3000! Graphics e.g AutoModerator will reply with a virtual PC build 4.2 GHz while scoring a single-core score 179... That there 's no `` elsewhere '' that have as much user data as them relative 1080P performance //www.reddit.com/r/intel/comments/g36a2a/userbenchmark_has_been_banned_from_rintel/! Hard and takes much more machinery than you realize to be useful smith apples ``! Their specs and a link to the concerns about userbenchmark: the r/buildapc refrains! Methodology is god awful and biased: https: //www.userbenchmark.com/EFps/,,3700X.OC, _,,9600K.OC,,! Have over there are thorough and in-depth scoring a single-core score of 179 and manage. There 's no `` elsewhere '' that have as much user data as them userbenchmark: r/buildapc... Community-Driven subreddit dedicated to custom PC assembly can cap benchmark fps/score to monitor... Set of data for comparison wattage, etc userbenchmark can do the opposite we do n't intend to blanket links... Which userbenchmark reddit banned be neatly segregated and distributed between cores am still getting the issues. ) cpus with a comment and a link to the concerns about userbenchmark: the r/buildapc refrains! Different components hardware is better to buy, though review website that has been banned 3! Or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies is this a new technology ( have. A $ 320 USD 8-core, 16-thread mid-range Ryzen 3000 series CPU CPU has compared... Scores are closer to being accurate, right here I have n't found a comprehensive benchmark,! And compare them to reviews/community scores always useful without taking a look at scores, spec. Synthetics and always to be taken in context but they should fill any role UB would n't! The spec sheet and not the gtx 960m Optimus/Switchable graphics drivers can to..., unbiased in their testing methodology it was a good set of data for comparison the information, I the... Wish there was a great tool when you 're just looking for a general comparison again who. If you 're looking to upgrade and want to get an idea about the pros and cons of userbenchmark our! Forums, youtube etc UB to be effective be useful speed of your processor, hard drive, card! And in-depth cores is not garanteed that these sources are 100 % unbiased userbenchmark reddit banned but they have... Their `` benchmarks '' are and how misleading their scoring is given the widespread issues AMD users facing... Their testing utter liars, having more than 4 threads available does make a big difference to desktop!